Postimees: Estonia Wakes Up With a War Plan

Waking up with Postimees today offered us a bitter surprise: Estonia might be invaded by Russia and now we even know why. Luckily not when.
And, strangely, it looks like someone forgot about the European Union
“ Since we started with this local part of the magazine, we tried to avoid these kinds of articles so, the first thing I want to do here, is to apologize with all the people who will not share my views: for some days I kept everything for myself and I did not write any single line about the Russian-Georgian crisis but now everything is going too far for staying silent.
Secondly, what I need to make clear since the beginning is that what you will find here is nothing more than my personal opinion and not cafebabel.com position on the current events. ”
I do not understand what people want and which sense of
belonging they have anymore.
I grew up being as much European as I could, participating to European
projects, living in as many different EU countries as I could, sharing my
experiences with my fellows Europeans and learning from their ones.
I went to schools explaining what EU is and which are the advantages of being
part of one of the most ambitious political projects in world’s history, I gave
my contribution to bring people to Brussels and make them feel a bit more part
of a mechanism that needs to be understood for being accepted and I started to
contribute to cafebabel.com as much as I could exactly because I shared the
founders dream of the construction of a pan-European public opinion.
I started to think that if
But, growing up and working on and with it, I learnt that being part of the European Union does not mean only getting advantages and positive things. It means also being aware of its risks, its challenges and, why not, its limitations.
Something everyone should learn how to deal with.
Then the Russian invasion started.
And someone, freely, chose to put the EU on standby for acting as a single
entity, detached from any kind of community.
Since years, here in EU, we have been struggling for
building a Common Foreign Security Policy: so far we did not succeed to get
exactly where we wanted, but the fact that now if anyone wanted to “call
But, again, the Russian invasion started.
And while Mr. Sarkozy started his diplomatic talks with Mr. Putin – or Medvedev ? - on behalf of the Union he is representing during this semester, someone else decided that it is time for pushing on the gas and try to bring the already though relation between Russia and EU neighboring countries to its most dangerous limit.
Sometimes it is almost populist to get back to April 2007
for explaining how problematic the relations between Russian-rooted and Estonian
citizens is in our country but, today, I guess it can be a good starting point.
Because, differently than the rest of the EU, everyone here has all the violence
of those days still deep inside.
No one forgot what happened as no one will ever forget what this country was
before the Nineties.
But, as we all have to live and share the same space, something should be done for explaining to people how to accept each other and get rid of those dangerous emotions left from a terrible past.
Not an easy task, this is sure.
But what would the politician job be, without such challenges?
Which message are journalists and opinion makers supposed to offer to the
population?
In the last days I have seen, red and heard local politicians
simply saying what their voters expected them to. Someone said that
Then I opened today’s Postimees.

At pages 6 and 7 Mr. Vahur Koorits writes an interesting
article about something which is unlikely to be happening as long as people do
not keep pushing for it: a Russian attack to
With the precious help of Leo Kunnas and a wonderful map, we
are enlightened about a possible imminent future: we know from where we will
get the tanks, from where the Russian air force and from where NATO troops will
come. Thanks to this brilliant analysis we even know that the trip between
Or, better to say, get ready to defend
Now, seriously, is it a kind of expired and stinky April’s fools joke or what?
What is the need to write about an imminent war which is NOT happening?
What happened to the common sense of that people who should be trying to compact in such a delicate moment?
Estonian economy is sick. Someone say crisis, someone said recession, someone else just said that it will pass. What is true is that it is not going fine anymore.
People are unhappy, they have to pay loans back sacrifying half of their salary and now they are somehow worried that a terrible kind of past will come back.
We are less than 2 Million people in this country and, let’s accept it or not, a considerable percentage is Russian-rooted and not really integrated into the national system. Opinion makers job is to help everyone to accept each other, not to split people in different sides.
And, in this sense, I am sorry my dear Postimees but you committed suicide today.
What I would like to ask to all the readers who got till
this point is: what happened to the people who should avoid all this?
Who should help people to feel more secure and safe if not our politicians?
Why in Postimees map the EU flag is totally absent?
Why Estonian politicians do not try to raise everything at the EU level for using diplomacy instead of anything else?
Why do they keep ignoring all our efforts targeted on our future CFSP by signing visa free agreement with US and taking whatever position they want in they foreign policy?
European Union is a great project: full of advantages but also of costs everyone should know. Anyone has been invited but, as it is an union of States, no one will ever be obliged to stay in if they do not want.
Or they do not accept its conditions.
War: Russia shows who is boss after bombs on Georgia
Georgi Khaindrava: ‘Russia can't remain a member of the G8’
Temuri Iakobashvili: 'Russia loves Georgia; they just don’t love the Georgian state'
Georgia fashion week 2011: open to Europe
Georgia: stepping on 'dictators'
Swiss, Spanish, German and Czech media on role-swapping Putin and Medvedev

Comments
your article is brillant Gio!
EU should be a union of people as was Jean Monnet's dream but it is also true at a national level. Before reaching a "supranational" union, States have to be unified. Estonia is definitely making a big mistake trying to set apart Russia and Russians living in Estonia. One would argue about the harsh past, the deportations... well that s the past, and you have to leave with the present, try to make things better, and particularly in tought conditions like today. les Mousquetaires famous saying is "l'union fait la force" translated : together we are stronger. That should be a good thesis topic for Estonia's politicians.
Russia is now able and willing to defend the rights of its citizens anywhere on the planet.
In my opinion, it doesn't matter if the country is in NATO or not. Russia will take actions, regardless, to guarantee these rights.
Sometimes the actions are economic. Sometimes political. Sometimes "military-technical."
In Vilnius for now we have protests and demonstrations EVERY DAY for Georgia. And no one is talking about invading Baltic countries. Is it bad or good? Who knows.
But actually these days biggest newspapers started wondering "what if". And yes, the same in here - no name of EU. Even no talks about NATO. In Lithuania we are saying: "If you're sinking, it's your own business how to get out". Looks like, that this opinion is to deep in our minds.
Huh, sorry if my comment doesn't fit article very well. Just wanted to let you know what's happening in here
EU is bunch of byrocrats. So is nato. If Russia attacks us, there will be for atleast 2 weeks of delay before anyone even gets permissions to move a finger about the issues.
But have to agree, calling the analysis even amateur is overestimation.
Behind South Ossetia there is just an old "match" :USA vs RUSSIA.
Anyway everything we can read is just PROPAGANDA.
So what Postimees is saying and what mostly estonians are then thinking is just bullshit!sorry but it is so!
CIAO
PS.Do you know who is Saakasvili?Probably not.
thank you for this article Giovanni!!it was vry good and calming to finally face some normality after the shock i witnessed when opening postimees online today morning.
Guys, get real, there is absolutely no possibility Russia will attack any time soon, this is girlie hysteria. Russia is interested in the oil transit business in Georgia, defending the Russian speakers was only an excuse. Russia would only attack if there was WW3 first, and that is never going to happen.
Hi Giovanni, I guess you were wondering comments of Estonian readers but here is a comment from Istanbul:)...Invasion of Estonia would be considered as invasion of EU and I am sure as a rational behaving country Russia will never attempt this. On the other hand this does not seem like a map designed rationally in the reason of disregarding global point of a possible invasion. Bytheway Gerogia is not similiar to other balkan countries neigbouring Russia. Saakasvilli did so much things to pull invasion of Russia but did nothing to relax relations with South Osetians. Georgia and Ossetia are just the grass...Russia and US are elephants jumping on the grass.
I totally agree with you, Giovanni. To promote fear and spread panic when people's emotions are already running on extreme high - and there is no real threat! - is just irresponsible journalism.
This article is nothing new to be honest. Every person who knows ANYTHING about national defence, knows that Narva and Pihkva are the places from where ground forces would be rolling in and Tallinn harbour would be blockaded. There's nothing "new" or "stupid" about it. There were some opinions that "now we have been shown how it would happen and now we're enlightened". Come one, if you couldn't figure that out by yourself, there's something wrong with your intelligence. Also criticising Estonia is pretty tough because it's just not Estonia who's feeling awkward about it. All the so called "buffer states" have the "what ifs". Yeah, sure, big EU states in Central Europe can breath calm because Russia is thousands of kilometers away, but to us, it's a painful subject considering our history.
Et voilà, one of my main points comes out thanks by "hmm" comment:
"Every person who knows ANYTHING about national defence, knows that Narva and Pihkva are the places from where ground forces would be rolling in and Tallinn harbour would be blockaded"
So, I ask, what is the point of building such news on Postimees?
Remember that we are not talking about Kroonika nor the so much blamed Delfi. We are talking about the most authoritative source of information in the whole country.
I do not know if there is anything wrong with my intelligence, but one of the many things I have been told before being allowed to get a pen and write, was that I do not have to take into account my intelligence when I write. I always have to consider that someone else will read my words therefor I am RESPONSIBLE of my word.
Apply the concept of RESPONSIBILITY to what Postimees did today and then read again what you just wrote:
"Every person who knows ANYTHING about national defence, knows that Narva and Pihkva are the places from where ground forces would be rolling in and Tallinn harbour would be blockaded. There's nothing "new" or "stupid" about it. There were some opinions that "now we have been shown how it would happen and now we're enlightened". Come one, if you couldn't figure that out by yourself, there's something wrong with your intelligence."
Then, the discussion about the past is totally different and I will try to avoid to have my say on that. I just though you made a choice while getting into EU, but probably I was wrong.
What Postimees wrote is something that is on every Estonian's mind. Has been there and will always be there. What you are suggesting is that we should bury our heads into sand and pretend there is no issue. There is. And it needs discussion.
If you ask me the official policy of Estonia right now in case of foreign invasion is to give up as quickly as possible. We even gave up mines. I bet the army has already been issued with white flags and white handkerchiefs. I guess it's a sound survival strategy.
As for the EU. The EU is weak and doesn't get anything done. Just look at how the constitution issue went. Anyways the true issue here is that estonians don't trust the EU. It is clear that the old Europe is terminally addicted to the Russian oil and gas. And will be even more so in the future as those resources will start to dry up around the world. It might be cynical to think so but I think there's a real chance they might just betray us. It might not be a nice thing to say - but again - heads into sand?
The only real mover in the NATO is USA but they no longer have much influence over what happens in the continental Europe. So things will move very slowly if something happens. And by then it'll be too late.
And to say there is no real threat is just naive. All one would have to do is plant a couple of bombs at ethnic russian businesses and events and memorials to flare up mass riots the local authorities can't cope with and then send in troops in the interest of protecting their citizens. Voila. If I was Hitler I'd do that.
It is clearly written into the Russian doctrine to protect their citizens or ethnic russians wherever they are. Using that as a pretext - anything is possible. Is Putin the next Hitler? Too soon to tell but it doesn't look good so far. You might say it's irresponsible to make a what if like that at the moment. Well, it'll be too late later on.
Also I guess these events clearly show what could happen and should make the government and the people very cautious on how they act on the next ethnic crisis.
You think that war and conflict is impossible. You are naive.
Dear Ints,
Thank you for your comment. As you can imagine I do not agree with your positions but this is what stimulates a debate! Although I would ask you to think twice before using some words next time...I would say it's not the right moment for writing - even for picturing mere hypothesis - the words bomb an Hitler while dealing with such issues.
"What you are suggesting is that we should bury our heads into sand and pretend there is no issue"
I suggest the opposite. In these years I spent in Estonia I learnt how deep the footprint of your past is marked in people's mind, but this does not mean that it should influence your whole future. What I would like people to do is to take their heads out of the sand and realize that 2008 is not 1988 and - whether we like it or not - European Union do exist.
"The EU is weak and doesn't get anything done. Just look at how the constitution issue went."
True, but it does not mean we *lost*. As everything at EU level is decided as a community-life requires, this happens. It is physiological, it is the difference between the European tradition and many other ones. Will be odd to get back to the Age of Enlightenment but...we talk, discuss, criticize, sometimes even lose oursvelves in ourt dialectic...but, damn, we do it! And, even if the treaty for the funcioning of the EU did not go well...well...I think would be at least un-objective not to recognize that the EU as such had many other success during its young life.
"the true issue here is that estonians don't trust the EU"
"It might be cynical to think so but I think there's a real chance they might just betray us."
It sounds as an Estonian problem while it is not. We probably failed on explaining EU to people, as someone else played at the time of accession. Few years after the enlargement, once all the enthusiasm for the economic growth and the EU funds is cooled down, maybe would be time for restarting a debate about it. I rember once I have been to a debate with Mr.Mikhelson and I suppose he did not like my criticism on the way Estonian politicians dealt with EU issues so far. I do not mean him personally cause I have a great respect for his job, but it is too easy to mention EU to people only when they have to give up producing milk or such issues.
The betrial part, then, will not happen. Maybe I like to keep my head warm into the sand but, as long as States will respect all the other members, I do not see why they should be left alone.
We share goals and ambitions, we share a project. But we all have responsibilities and duties, I hope no one will forget about it.
"All one would have to do is plant a couple of bombs at ethnic russian businesses and events and memorials to flare up mass riots the local authorities can't cope with and then send in troops in the interest of protecting their citizens. Voila. If I was Hitler I'd do that."
I suppose we will not do it. Thanks to our education, we are interested on what happens around us, on understanding and discussing it. I suppose this is why you found this page and this is why I do write here.
But we are also aware that there is also other people whom can be easily influenced by papers and magazines. Once again, it was Postimees. And people, in this country, build up opinions according to Postimees words.
Threatening a conflict in that way is the only thing which could wide the division between people in a moment when the opposite would be needed.
I apologize for the longest comment in my life, but I think it was worth.
Ints, good points. I agree that it is naive to think Russia is no threat to Estonia. What is troubling is if the west continues to sit on its hands, Russia will follow the template they are trying to establish in Georgia (and have already started in Crimea and Transnistria):
* Organize a vote for independence in Ida-Viru
* Encourage, arm and join them in rioting, attacking Estonians in the region, etc.
* Estonian law enforcement tries to stop the rioting
* Russia sends troops and says "we are not invading Estonia, we are trying to enforce peace between an oppressor and Russian citizens in Ida Viru, a region that has voted for its own independence"
(Estonia can be called an oppressor since it has been regularly condemned for marginalizing its Russian population by the west)
If Nato doesn't come down hard and expel Russia, Estonia will have the SAME situation as Georgia - an autonomous region that is internationally recognized as part of Estonia, but in REALITY is occupied by Russian troops and is under Russian control.
The best case is obviously if Nato does force the Russians out. But Estonia is still left with a region that has voted for independence. If the "Ida Viru freedom fighters" continue to make trouble, what does that mean for the future prospects of the country? Particularly considering they control the Narva power plants
What worries me the most is the vote for autonomy (in some ways the most important step) is impossible to stop and not military in nature.
Is all of this paranoia? perhaps. But Estonia is foolish if it doesn't do everything in its power to increase the number of Estonians in Ida Viru
-------------------------------------
Regarding the article, one could certainly accuse Postimees of being sensationalistic. But for the reasons others have stated, I think it was necessary. In fact, I think it should be required reading for the countless Estonians that have skipped their "mandatory" military service with doctor's notes.
Hi Pip, and the others,
I try to understand your position as an Estonia (I talked with my girlfriend and she had the same arguments) but still, to my opinion a russian invasion is very unlikely to happen, and this for different reasons. Firstly, Estonia is not Georgia, Estonia (whether you like it or not) is still in the EU and attacking Estonia would mean attacking the EU. I am not convinced that Russia would like to have EU against them as they would lose a huge economic partner. One would say that we are dependent on gas-oil and that is true BUT waging war is a different story. Secondly, as several people said before me, Russia is obviously interested in the gazoduc and oleoduc passing by Georgia - South Ossetia is just a diversion for Russian citizens reading propaganda news. Their plan was well planned and even Sakaashvili went directly to that trap! What would Russian be interested in Estonia? oil shale? maybe harbours but that would be ridiculous. No, the only reason would be (this is my view obviously) an "old Soviet retribution" and the fact that they did not digest your independence; but such thing would be stupidity at its best. You might think whatever you want about Putin, you can despise him (Medvedev is anyway just a puppet now) but he is everything but stupid...
Also, if Estonian politicians keep pushing too much the bad relationship with Russia and try not to integrate a bit more Russian people living in Estonia, it might get worse BUT again, they would use economic punishement or once again cyber attacks.
Another last comment about your idea to send Estonians to Ida-Viru. Here you would be using the same weapon as the Soviets did in the Baltics when they were implementing a big russification plan. So if you dont want to become like them, you should use more clever and social measures, which are usually long-term measures. BTW to send people over there you would need to create lots of jobs... how??
Russia is a country that is poisoning its dissidents using radioactive sushi.
Russia is a country that is willing to poison politicians of its former satellites to gain a favourable regime.
Russia is a country where journalists get murdered or disappear.
Russia is a country where the opposition is regularely harassed and so practically non-existent.
Russia is a country where almost all of the mass media is controlled by the government.
Russia is a country where all power is in the hands of one man (we can already say - a dictator) who thinks that the greatest disaster in the last century was the collapse of the soviet union and has made his mission to restore the greatness of Russia.
And now Russia is a country that is willing to use military force against a foreign country.
Wake up and smell the coffee. We have no choice but to agressively counter Russia's ambitions. And right now. Otherwise we'll be sorry later on.
Restoring the greatness of one's country might seem a stupid reason to you, but I bet it's not to Putin. And Putin is not a stupid person. He sees the west as an enemy and considers the former soviet states as Russia's rightful property.
EU has done one great thing for us - economic independence from Russia. This in itself is a wonderful asset, we would not survive without it.
As for diplomacy and trying to find compromises. Here's a link to you from history:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZHp...
Great diplomatic success, wouldn't you say. Lets not make that kind of mistake again.
Ints, I agree that Russia is most of the things you have mentionned at the beginning of your last comment. I also want to mention that I am not trying to defend Russia, in this story they are to blame.
There is one thing however I disagree with, Russia is not interested at all in restoring its former greatness. They have it already, they have enough ressources for that purpose. Their main fear is to see all their former satellites turning into pro-european or pro-us "democracies". Russia is losing its sphere of influence little by little. Putin doesnt care if Belorussia or any other country is now independent as long as it is still one of its servants. What we see in Georgia and Ukraine trying to get in NATO, and the US pushing hard to incorporate them as quickly as possible is not comparable to Estonia. It is already too late, Estonia is in EU and NATO. That's it, end of the story.
Also, your historic example of "betrayal" - we ve heard a lot of betrayal lately.. - was 70 years ago!!! You cant compare diplomacy in the 30s and today given the huge geopolitical differences. But I give you this, yes diplomacy is not always successful.
As for this sentence "We have no choice but to agressively counter Russia's ambitions", well my dear friend, stop talking and take your weapons, but I wont follow you!
Sphere of influence, territory and military might - that is greatness in Putin's mind.
Each situation is different of course. But do you really think people have changed that much in the last 70 years? In the last 1000 years? Appease a tyrant and the end result is the same no matter which century. Diplomacy is great but it has its limits - making unreasonable and naive compromises will get you into trouble later on.
And I'm not talking about starting a war with Russia. We need to stop Russia from spreading its influence, we have to show Russia that it won't get away with things like this. The means for that range from diplomacy to inviting Ukraine to NATO to defensive military means to sending European peacekeepers into Georgia. For example if an ethnic conflict flares up here or in Latvia or in the Ukraine we should be able to deploy a considerable force on only couple of day's notice to keep the peace. No such force exists now. It would take probably a month to mobilize it at the moment - by then it would be too late.
If we don't counter Russia now then later on I will have to take my weapon into my hand to defend myself, whether I want it or not. And soon after that you my friend will have to also. I want to prevent that from ever happening. That's the reason for my "tough" position on Russia.
Will there ever be European peacekeepers in Georgia? No, there won't. And we come back to our main theme. EU is weak and lacks will to proactively keep peace in the world or even within its own borders. It's easier to appease a tyrant thousands of miles away than to do anything. One is defined to the world not by one's words but by one's actions. NATO and EU might just be words in some dictionary and nothing else.
Estonia won its war of independence with outside help.
Essentially, the British navy kept the Bolsheviks out of Tallinn, while the Estonians and volunteers from Finland, Sweden, Denmark, and other countries drove them out of Estonian territory.
Almost a century later and little has changed, strategically. Estonia is defensible, if the right connections are made.
As for the "Ida Viru" question, two points. The first is that most of that county, physically, is populated by ethnic Estonians.
The second point is that most of the major industry is Estonian or foreign owned. Who owns Kreenholm? The Swedes. Who owns Silmet? Estonians.
So it's not exactly ripe for separatism.
Gui, I'm not Estonian, I'm just someone who has been living here on and off for quite a while. Yes, encouraging Estonians to move to Ida-Viru is at best a medium term solution. And I wholeheartedly agree that the proper long term fix would be social measures (but they are slow to take effect).
You're right that convincing anyone to move would be difficult and I'm not sure of the best strategy. Any incentives would be costly and unlikely in light of the current budget problems. Perhaps targeting people outside of the large cities, particularly those currently employed servicing the local population whose jobs are not so tied to a particular location (i.e retail, doctors, lawyers).
Giustino, interesting points. I think regardless of whether the entire region or a smaller geographic area separates - Russia is just looking for a pretext to act, making the initial size of the region they are "defending" not relevant. After all, their military has clearly shown no regard for the borders of the initial conflict zone in Georgia.
Though foreign interest of Estonian enterprises increases the chances of NATO & EU intervention - it still cannot prevent the populace of the region from voting for whatever they choose.
My point is that with a resurgent Russia on its doorstep, Estonia should be looking at what its vulnerabilities are. Considering what Russia has already started in 3 countries, the large Russian population in Ida Viru fits this new "Russia doctrine" perfectly. Yes Estonia is not Georgia - but even if NATO & the EU serve as an effective deterrent, simply having a region separate could be deeply damaging in the political, economic and diplomatic spheres
(BTW - Apologies for my long posts, I've always been more of a talker that a concise writer)
The government should move one of its ministries to Narva or Jõhvi -- perhaps ministry of social affairs or ministry of population affairs. Maybe both.
The ministry of education is already in Tartu.
I know that next year's presidential gala is in Jõhvi. There should be more activity going on there.
Indeed, what is wrong with this article? I am Estonian Russian and I feel secure and safe having read that the regime in Tallinn is absolutely pathetic. If they start ethnic cleansing as Georgians did in South Ossetia, they will receive 'crushing response' from Mr Medvedev and nobody will help them militarily. Good.
Giovanni, a bit of reading might do good:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/serv...
[In the Georgia crisis, those nation-states and international bodies that defended the global rules, that condemned Russia for breaking them, and that used the soft power of public diplomacy to restore their effectiveness were all forces that could ultimately call on hard power and/or serious national self-interest to support their words. Practitioners of hard power were able to use soft power; advocates of soft power ended up wielding no power.]
Estonians are national democrats.
I am sorry to put it so bluntly, but are you a global legalist?
No promise of Merkel or Sarkozy or any other EU or NATO official is enough if it is not backed by reality (real military power right here in the Baltics). Right now if a conflict would develop here, Estonia and Baltics in general are lucky to only count on limited air support from NATO.
We need a fighting chance on the ground, we need to keep our ground until NATO or EU reinforcements arrive.
And that is why we (the Baltics together) have to beef up into something like Finland or Switzerland really quickly. Ultimately, we can count on only our Baltic neighbours, until reinforcements arrive. The alternative would be NATO bases in the Baltics.
If we can't reach such a deterrant on the ground, then in the medium to long run we have to seriously consider developing independent MAD capability as the ultimate deterrant. Sounds mad, but it's a MAD world.
As to Ida Viru, it is my impression that Estonia cultivates laizess faire. In other words, it is a waiting game who dies out (or gets assimilated) first: estonians or immigrants. Immigrants are largely in three groups: in Ida-Viru, in Tallinn and Harju, and elsewhere. Population dynamics are probably very different between and inside these groups - Ida Viru is the strongest, Tallinn and Harju is the middle ground.
As a whole, as I recall about 70% of russians have a russian as a mate. For estonians it was 93% I guess. All in all, it will take at least 5 to 10 centuries for the Estonian population to coalesce into one. That has happened before, when baltic tribes came here among us 4000 years ago. And some russians later on.
Oh, just to add a point, Ida Viru becomes more important to Estonia in 200-400 years when the sealevel rise from AGW has sunk most of western Estonia.
And Ida Viru will become more attractive when large scale mining stops there (read: post-peak energy world) in about 20-30 years.
The Estonian newspapers publish only what America says.
Estonian politics do only what America orders.
The Estonian President is an American. Sakaasvili is an American protégé.
The EU should help to Estonia and to other ex-Soviet countries to get freedom of America.
More, the EU is indifferent to hard violation of the human rights in Estonia and in other countries, like it did forward the Georgia/Ossetia problems, the indifferentness and omittion to intervene can provoke a new war, the III world war.
The last post is perfect:
The Estonian newspapers publish only what America says.
Estonian politics do only what America orders.
The Estonian President is an American.
I'm in Estonia from 2005 and I saw really to many american symbols everywhere....
Are u really in love with the american culture dear Estonians?
Is it the american dream also your dream dear Estonians?
It seems like that and neoliberalism is the dominant word here.
Can I ask you why? Only because USA represented the strong barrier against the russian power during the cold war??
You don't need to go far to find a different model of develop. Probably it is not perfect but it definitely better than the yankee system.
You have the past in common and they are just across a little space of sea. I call it:Swedish welfare system.
I wanted to help Estonia when they got independent. Out of Honor and memory of my late father who served the last Estonian Army and was witness to the humiliating capitulation in 1940 when the Dictator President Pats sold the Estonian nation out caused lots of trauma for my father and countless Estonian soldiers and citizens, being taken into the Soviet Army 22 Territorial Army corps and Latter the German Army and finally volunteering for the Finnish Army was a very tough traumatic experience espically dealing with the 1944 re occupation and the brutal treatment of my grandfather and family at the hands of the Soviets and never being able to come back to his homeland. My Late father was blacklisted by the KGB and out of honor, memory of him and that I never saw my grand parents, I wanted to give of my military experiences to the new Estonian nation. I always had a deep feeling to see Estonia free and see a New Estonian Army created and possibly be part of it. Well I was. In 1995 I was asked to assist in the development of the New Estonian Army, mainly Military Police. In nearly 3 years of service to the Estonian people and nation in the Estonian Army I served as Provost Marshall (Chief Of Military Police) of Tallinn and also of the Baltic Battalion Estonian Company at that time period. I must say with all truth that my experience was also traumatic, I leaned from the school of hard knocks, That Estonians are their Worst Enemy, Not Russians, I found many Estonians to be Dishonest, Sneaky, Liers, Backstabbers who are selfish, greedy and could not give a damn about their fellow humane being, One example was one winter foreign NATO Trainers and advisors to the Estonian company training center BaltBat were going to the Pladiski training base. from Tallinn area in the morning, their mini bus over turned,in the city of Keila and rolled on to a farm field. The other accompanying vehicle full with Estonian sponsors/support personnel, briefly slowed down but did not stop to assist the occupants of the vehicle in this emergency situation. This was personally told to me by a Danish military advisor, who stated that the NATO and Finnish instructors are unsure ;"Do not trust the Estonians". A British advisor told me,"The Scots have Golf, The Estonians have the Lie"!
The Co author of this Postimees article Leo Kunnas I have a personal experience with him, he was VERY UNPROFESSIONAL AND supported LIERS and treated subdonates very badly ,As the commandant of the Battle School, I attended, Officers course there and because I was born in America I was not accepted as an Estonian. I was repeatedly derogatorily referred to: a "Foreign Estonian", harassed and badly treated by my so called fellow Estonians, It turned out to be a nightmare. During my time in the Estonian Army I also observed lots of corruption, Items given to Estonia, from America, and NATO countries etc, like boots and clothing supplies, equipment etc that were destined for Estonian soldiers to get,were frequently sold on the local markets, When I was asked by other officers and officials about want Estonia needs I told them, Tanks, Fighter Jets & Helicopters, The answer I received was troubling; "We Will Fight A Forest Brother War", I was told. I reminded the parties that Estonia wants to be NATO,there are certain requirements that members have to have/fulfill; an Army capable to defend oneself and aid another member state. Estonians did not care. Every little civil servant drove around in a brand new Mercedes Benz Ironically then always came the answer, "We Have No Money", Who will come to our aid" Kes tuleb Meie abi Jne". The Chief Military Attaches of the various diplomatic embassies knew Estonian officials are very corrupt and unreliable. I must say Sadly Estonians have not learned from the tragic events of 1939 and 1940 and 50 plus years of brutal occupation. The Estonian Army in the inner war period was lacking Heavy weaponry; Tanks,Fighter and Bombers etc. Still as of October 2009 to my knowledge Estonia does not even have ONE Tank in it's inventory, Habi=SHAME ON ESTONIA.
Until Estonians learn to accept their own people born abroad and Stick Together and get some, Sisu, Huspah, get rid of the Slave/defeatist mentality they will always be treated like a slave by the Russians. Israel is a good example for Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Estonia has had many opportunities to obtain heavy weaponry, Tanks etc, When East Germany merged with West Germany the entire Former East German Army weaponry was available, Estonians ,Latvians and Lithuanians made a big mistake, not to obtain the former East German NVA stock. A few years Latter Poland offered to Give Free of charge to Estonia, Tanks, The Estonian snobs did not even have the curtosy to respond with a answer. Estonians are Ingrates and I will never again risk my life for they they are not worth it. Estonia needs a fight with Russia so that they would get their asses kicked and then realize they need to build an effective Real army with Tanks, Helicopters Fighters and bombers etc and learn to unite Estonians around the world.